NCSS 2023 - OpenConf Abstract Submission, Peer Review, and Event Man= agement System

Sample Review
Submission ID: 0

TIP: Use a local text = editor to write your review, and then select/copy the information below. T= his way, in case of a network outage, you won't lose the review.

Review

Abstract:

How well = do the title and abstract match the presentation description?

&= nbsp;

1-Minimally or not at all 2-Fairly Well 3-Very Well =

Primary Focus:

How well does the primary focus designation correlate = with the abstract and presentation descriptions?

1-Minimally or not at all = 2-Fairly Well 3-Very We= ll

Objectives and Description:

Are the objectives and presentation descr= iption clearly stated?

= 1-No- Not at All Clearly &nb= sp; 2-Fairly Clearly = 3-Very Clearly

Relevancy:

Are the content and/or skills highlighted in the presentat= ion relevant to the intended audience?

1-Not at all relevant 2-Fa= irly relevant 3-Very relevant

Interaction Opportunities:

Do the presentation strategies include opp= ortunities for audience interaction?

1-Few or none at all 2-Some = 3-Many

Method/Strategy:

Does the proposal present an instructional method or strategy that you would like to learn more about?

1-No 2-Possibly = 3-Yes

Underserved Area:

Does the proposal address an underserved area of so= cial studies?

1-No 2-Possibly &nb= sp; 3-Yes

New Topic or Practice:<= div class=3D"fieldnote note">Does the proposal present a new topic or instr= uctional practice?

1-No 2-Po= ssibly 3-Yes

Interest:

Is the proposal relevant and of interest to social studies = educators?

1-No= 2-Possibly 3-Yes = ;

Want to Attend:

Is this a session that you would want to attend?

1-Probably = Not 2-Maybe 3-Y= es

Recommendation:&= nbsp;

1-Definitely Reject 2-Possibly Accept 3-De= finitely Accept

Additional Information F= or Committee

Comments for the Program Committee (presenters will not see thes= e comments):

Please include any additi= onal comments that might help the Program Committee when making its final s= elections.

Reasons for Accepting:<= div class=3D"fieldnote note">Check any reasons for your recommendation to a= ccept that you think might be useful to the Program Planning Committee.

Deals with a hot topic that will draw a large audience
Has been done before and was very well= received
Brings a fresh perspec= tive to the conference
Clarity o= f the proposal inspires confidence
Addresses an underserved area of social studies

Reasons for Possibly Accepting:=

Good proposal but may have limited appeal Other proposals deal with this same topic Not enough information to accept= without reservations

Reasons for Rejecting:<= div class=3D"fieldnote note">Check any reasons for your recommendation that= you think might be useful to the Program Planning Committee.

&= nbsp;

Will have limited appeal to its intended audience
This topic/session been presented before and was not w= ell received
There are better = proposals dealing with this same topic
Vagueness of proposal does not inspire confidence